So much wrong with this.
1) Not a single photo is in focus.
2) Not a single photo is orthogonal to the horizon.
3) The realtor's email address is at AOL.com.
4) Parquet floors.
Yeah it's $3.6m for 1500sqft, yeah it's in Trump Tower and yeah it used to belong to Paul Manafort but fuckin' hell faux bamboo and marble? I guess it answers the question "where does a man who wears an ostrich leather jacket live?"
It's like the photographer was packing up their things, lighting a cigarette, and calling their spouse when someone asked if they'd remembered to take a picture of the bathroom. This is the shittiest picture in the bunch, imo - the other ones at least give you SOME idea of the room's scale. "Ah fuck it, why shouldn't a towel bar be the focal point?!" - Some guy probably
Yeah. Some old shitty point'n'shoot Sony A75 or some shit. To go with his AOL.com email address. Who the fuck doesn't stage a $3.6m condo overlooking Central Fucking Park? God damn I miss Lovely Listing.
Yet it’s still one of the only things I could actually imagine spending millions on, if I had the money. Because it’d probably be a wise investment, but mostly just so I could say “Hey, wanna head back to Manafort’s place?” after a night out in Manhattan.
What if most of the floors and walls were curving mirror surfaces designed to focus any light sources on several areas where I could do my Manafort impressions? No but actually it would be really fun to design a room like that with some ray tracing software and enough time. The curved mirror surfaces could be embedded at the bottom of an optically translucent material, like glass or plastics, that could allow for even floor/wall surfaces