Some states tried this once, but the federal government didn't let them. It was a big news item for a while.
Yeah, but it wasn't like there were any social, economic, or political repercussions, short term or long term. Let California have a go. What could possibly go wrong? Edit: Fucking sarcasm advisory here because suddenly Ive founded myself talking to people taking me seriously on this bullshit. Give me some fuxking credit here people. I know I'm a dense mother fuxker, but I'm not a dumbass.
Texas v White from 1869 is the case that comes up when I search "can a state seceded." Answer: not unilaterally.
There's a long standing debate about whether the USA exists at the pleasure of the states, or whether the states exist at the pleasure of the USA. Those in favor of "nullification" before and shortly after the civil war certainly thought the former. However, SCOTUS in that case and others have come down firmly on the side of the latter. Since states exist contractually at the pleasure of the federal government, the government could grant them the right to secede, but if I lived in CA, I wouldn't hold my breath (although it would be hilarious to see Thiel all of a sudden not live in Trump's America). I've often thought that we should have let the Confederacy go at the time. Was the Union really worth saving? KKK is still influencing elections 150 years later.
When I visit the south, I often wonder if the rural poverty is still a result of the war. I've been to Belfast, too. Seeing the aftermath of war in a first world country seems out of place, but I think it's still there.