Controversial religion Scientology offers a method to delete a painful past. But, as explored in films 'The Master' and 'We Live In Public', is the method worth it?
Most the members aren't allowed to know the mythology. You don't learn the mythology until you've been in for many years if you get the point where you are allowed to learn it at all. By the time you reach that point you are basically ready to believe anything they tell you. You have separated from all your non-scientologist family and friends, you have probably signed a bunch of questionable contracts and are deeply in debt or have paid tens of thousands of dollars (they don't teach lost cost fallacy). You have been told for many years about the incredible power and happiness of the people who rank above you in the process and your own lack of happiness makes you chase the idea that if you keep to it maybe it will happen to you. You feel like a fraud because so much of this stuff isn't happening to you and the solution is to try harder, believe harder.
Some of the mythology is common knowledge through the Book of Dianetics written by the founder of Scientology: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianetics It has to start somewhere and Hubbard's sci-fi authorial past seems to do the job until this day.
Yup. Human's have the desire to be part of a group. It's called "Belongingness" Scientology certainly provides that to a unique set of individuals, especially those, like Cruise, who have a narcissistic tendencies. Plus, high profile people in the entertainment industry probably hesitate to walk into any old church, where they may cause quite a stir and be surrounded by a demographic that is vastly different than them. Take a look at the list of Scientologists
Definitely agree. Our desire to be apart of a social group is one of the great crutches of modern religion. I have met so many people that care more about the social group religions inherently provide, than the doctrine or even the philosophy. However, Scientology confuses me because they do seek explanation. It is really the only "new religion" that recruits and still strongly depends on explanation. I guess the only way that this is possible in the 2013 is to utilize the word "science" and a pseudoscientific approach to lure in people who lack a strong social network and have no science education.Human's have the desire to be part of a group. It's called "Belongingness"
That video in the article that splices a Tom Cruise interview with the South Park episode of scientology does a nice job of pointing out just how crazy the religion is and as such, just how nuts Cruise has to be in order to be it's poster boy. That said, is scientology any more far fetched than other religions? Take christianity and their creation story that involves talking serpents and all womenkind being forged out of the rib of one man. Noah and his ark that housed all of the worlds living creatures. Burning bushes that talk with the voice of god. A savior that comes only to be brutally killed, because... you know, he had to die so that we can live. -Odd stuff. I'm not sure that alien souls inhabiting our ancestors bodies is any less weird than that stuff. As for whether or not people should attempt to erase their memories, this is a fundamental desire for all humans. This is why we like to have a few glasses of wine, or to go on vacation. These things help us to forget some of our stresses. It's natural. But to want to completely erase your memories is 1. unhealthy and 2. impossible outside of serious bodily harm. One of my favorite song lyrics is from Wilco's Ashes of American Flags "No thanks," is my response to all of them.
We all desire to "come back new." This is why the evangelical movement in the US and increasingly the world, is so prevalent. People want a fresh start and religions, Scientology included, like to capitalize on this. All my lies are always wishes
I know I would die if I could come back new
Most religions, like Christianity, tell Truths, but they aren't the truth. They aren't facts. It's skilled writing and metaphor. Problems arise when people take these stories and Truths as truth & facts and run with it. Or they interpret it in damaging, hateful, and harmful ways. Is Scientology any more far-fetched than other religions? Only because it's come about in a time where we can easily distinguish fact from fiction and science from science fiction. If it had come about at the same time as Christianity, I don't think it would, because the same progression of interpretation would have happened. Furthermore, religion in itself isn't inherently harmful & it can even be helpful. It can help bring people together, give them a reason to be "good," help with coping, and much more. However, people can also use religion as a weapon or a crutch and that can make it dangerous. I mean the guy who killed Lennon was obsessed with Catcher in the Rye. Does that make Catcher in the Rye an inherently dangerous book? Scientology just gets a lot of slack because it's new, it's "hip," and the people we associate with Scientology are celebrities, each hosting their own unique set of crazy - the cause of the crazy may or may not be attributed to Scientology but certainly helps explain why they are attracted to Scientology. For what it's worth, if Tom Cruise did the same thing to Christianity I think we would still look at him as a bit of a maniac and zealot. But our view of the religion wouldn't change, just our view of a single individual. This is because or thoughts and opinions on Christianity and other major religions have been shaped by a number of things - people, places, childhood, memories, books, teachings, whatever it may be. But Scientology doesn't have that same expansive reach and thus our opinions are formed via Tom Cruise & South Park.That said, is scientology any more far fetched than other religions?