a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00
kleinbl00  ·  2072 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Sci-Fi club: general discussion

For some reason, Mona Lisa Overdrive suffered a number of terrible covers. The mass-market paperback with the most printings could be a cover for literally anything, which is better than the awful ones like the one you found.

The competition for "worst sci fi cover art", by the way, is steep.





zebra2  ·  2072 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Oh man, back when I was reading through the Hugo winner list it was a victory parade of awful covers. There's a particular grossness to the 60s-70s era, but it's hard to say there's a time period where they don't suck.

The other day I picked up one which has this exceptionally awful cover:

It's bad enough that I had to hide the cover of it when leaving the bookstore, but I also have this terrible non-germane representation of the character corrupting my mental image of what the character was intended to be.

Edit: OH almost forgot the worst part: red edge gilding on the book.

kleinbl00  ·  2072 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I think it was a problem of cheapness. There were lots of books, there were talented illustrators, but there wasn't enough money for every book to have a talented illustrator. I mean, that's peak Frank Franzetta time. Michael Whelan was rolling in. Vincent de Fate was everywhere. But you also got stuff like this:

(also a Jack Vance, first book of Planet of Adventure, which your Jack Vance cover has also been used for:)

goobster  ·  2072 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I love the cover of the one I found... feels so Blade Runner vs Fifth Element vs Nagel vs 80's Solo cup...

kleinbl00  ·  2072 days ago  ·  link  ·  
goobster  ·  2071 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Oh man, I do love that style... every line moving a bit, even on stationary objects... everything in motion...