- There was a heroin crisis in New York City in the 1960s, with overdose deaths increasing each year of the decade. There were almost 1,000 overdose victims in New York City in 1969, about as many as in 2015. The then chief medical examiner of New York, Milton Helpern, together with his deputy chief, Michael Baden, investigated these deaths. They discovered that many died, not from a true pharmacological overdose, but even when, on the day prior, the victim had administered a comparable dose with no ill effects. Helpern, Baden and colleagues noted that, while it is common for several users to take drugs from the same batch, only rarely does more than one user suffer a life-threatening reaction. They examined heroin packages and used syringes found near dead addicts, and tissue surrounding the sites of fatal injections, and found that victims typically self-administered a normal, usually non-fatal dose of heroin. In 1972, Helpern concluded that ‘there does not appear to be a quantitative correlation between the acute fulminating lethal effect and the amount of heroin taken’.
despite them laying out the results of some scientific studies... my brain still thinks this isn't a scientific explanation for the mystery... I'm not really challenging the author(s), I'm kinda challenging my own mind. This is interesting to say the least.
Yeah, I also thought the author could've more deeply explored their own explanation for the mystery. Nevertheless, I thought that despite that it was interesting enough and I'm glad you agree. For what it's worth, in my uni days I used to smoke a lot of weed. Whenever I'd come home during the holidays, it always felt as though I got much higher, even when I smoked less. My friend who I'd always chill with expressed similar feelings too. Sure, anecdotal evidence. But it's intriguing that there might be something more to these experiences that I'd previously written of as a placebo or illusion of some sort.