You will not find any Thomas Kinkade fans here. As a matter of fact, we celebrate the original work of many of the contributors to this website. Post your own work, if you feel like you want to, it will not be out-of-place, and will definitely not be met with toxic opinions. If you're a working artist, please, please do, there aren't a whole lot of ya'll here, so it would be great. You did not hear that here, tho. Literally, if you look below this, flag just stated his intention to go visit an Impressionist exhibit in at the MFA. so the crowd you are throwing his hat into the ring with (which by the way, is the actual problem here) simply doesn't apply. You're making this about your experience rather than the person you're responding to. That's not nice. Flag was not lobbing a thought into the void, hoping to provoke, he was literally responding to kleinbl00. They have a history, this is a community, it is not random thoughts bumping uglies. Most of the time. You are making a good point at the wrong time. you are attaching cultural baggage to the wrong person. I'm not trying to just simply be right nor say anything about your opinion, which I agree with. I am simply trying to help you understand why he said what he said, because you seem to be missing the point. I'm old enough to know better than to pick internet fights, and I'm not. I'm straight-up, truth-be-told, doing exactly what I would do with any of my friends, IRL or otherwise. I highly recommend apologizing, not because I'm coercing you, not because I want you to "admit you're wrong" but just simply because it's decent. You misspoke and lashed out at someone who didn't deserve it, and they deserve an apology. It's a kind gesture and it will be reciprocated. I repeat: this is not the void.This is something I know a lot about and his opinion is ignorant and toxic to working artists.
I can make assumptions because I hear this attitude casually all the time, on the internet and in life, and my response is based more on that history.
... just saying, 'I don't like this thing.'
I'm old enough to know when to pick my battles so when I'm abrasive it's because I have a good point to make.
You're really not saying anything that means anything to me and you're not following me well, but that's probably my fault. I'm targeting an attitude, not a person. I set up some arguments that might seem like they were directed at him personally. I wasn't assuming anything except that he thinks "abstract" art is kinda not good (low hanging fruit). I might do a text rundown of the past 150 years of art over a few text posts. I might write a book about it but that doesn't seem like such an original idea unless I can do it better than the other people who've tried.
I am utterly following you, I do not see how you could think otherwise, unless: a) you sincerely cannot see that I'm reaching out and trying to say "we can totally be friends, but you did something misplaced that isn't conducive to functioning communities of people with varied opinions" like, as in these words are totally incomprehensible to you b) you cannot read my posts or do not have time to. sometimes i get long-winded and tangential, and plenty of people do not have enough time to read my barrage of nonsense. I do not hold this against them. c) you don't believe me. I cannot help you there, nor do i blame you d) you have your head so far up your pretentious ass that you think the world is brown. Like, you think you're at a podium somewhere, when you're actually just blasting spittle all over one person's face on the street. guess which one I'm leaning towards Like, jesus, I'm not writing some tacocat's Tuesdays with Morrie here, but I am at least a small amount self-aware enough to know when I'm authentically trying to be empathetic and not just lash out with rabid generalizations (which is what you did), and be, well, polite. Until now, tho. in summation:
hush.You're really not saying anything that means anything to me
I want to hush. But you're clearly not following my intent. |I am utterly following you, I'm telling you that you aren't. I wrote it, I know what I meant. I like to throw a little mock outrage in my writing for my entertainment and the reader's. Everyone's acting like I'm going to start running over puppies on purpose and I'm not even mad.
For better or for worse, Hubski is a community which generally believes (hopes) they're talking to a real person acting in a genuine manner. So throwing in 'mock outrage', which is near impossible to detect in this context, will only serve to make people think you're genuinely outraged. For the most part, it will not entertain or serve to improve your point. You don't have to feel the need to tart up your opinions for the reader's benefit. If you've got something you're passionate about, simply express it in a constructive manner and people will be interested and respond accordingly.I like to throw a little mock outrage in my writing