a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00
kleinbl00  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: How a self-driving car killed a pedestrian in Arizona

Yes. If a person had been driving the car, she would be alive. THAT is the argument: even with a reduced reaction time, inferior vision and molasses-slow processing, the human has evolved to see other humans.

Lost in all this is the false equivalence about Uber/Tesla autonomy vs. Google autonomy. They aren't even vaguely the same. Google is trying to turn the entire world into a well-defined slot car track while Uber figures they can make a robot who knows how to drive.

Uber is failing.





WanderingEng  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    Uber/Tesla autonomy

What's Tesla's next step? Last I knew "autopilot" simply meant "adaptive cruise control and lane assist." I have to hand it to Tesla's marketing department on that naming.

kleinbl00  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I here humbly invite b_b to slag on Tesla because he's so much better at it than me.

b_b  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I'm retired. Just like with Christopher Nolan, I can only take so much hatorade before it's just not worth it anymore.

oyster  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

But how do we actually know that ? There was a human in the car who’s job was to make sure the vehicle didn’t screw up and somebody still died.

kleinbl00  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

The human failed to intervene.

Worthy of note: Google's cars have no intervening humans. They acknowledge that if you're counting on the human to keep you out of trouble, you're guaranteeing that you'll have trouble when the human is least ready.

oyster  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I figure he got comfortable like a lot of other normal drivers do, maybe it’s my paranoia but I think many drivers would have reacted poorly in his situation. A lot of people drive in predictable places and then they go traveling and they merge at 50 km/h directly in front of a semi going closer to 90 km/h while I sit on the on ramp thinking but I’m the one who hit my head, why are you like this ?

Back in drivers ed my instructor randomly said “ I see a cop car, do you” and then went on a story about how he never got a ticket because he was always scanning. His main point was that a lot of people get comfortable and stop scanning and looking for the seemingly unpredictable.

I do agree that the likelihood of the human safety driver being aware enough to intervene is low because they aren’t really engaged in the driving process before that point. They really seem like more of a false sense of security.

kleinbl00  ·  2217 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I'll wager that at 38mph, you wouldn't hit a raccoon.

You wouldn't hit a porcupine.

You sure as shit wouldn't hit a deer.

A pedestrian?

So some pedestrians do dumb shit. Homeless pedestrians in particular. I was coming around a 50mph curve once, at night, in the rain, only to find a black dude (a dark black dude) wearing camouflage fatigues pumping his wheelchair in the middle of the middle of three lanes right at me. He waved. He knew he was doing dumb shit, but he did dumb shit anyway.

I didn't hit him, and neither did anyone in front of me. Neither did anyone behind me. Was he lucky? Hells yeah. But in general, people are lucky when it comes to cars. That's because humans have, deep in our understanding of the world, the notion that sometimes shit goes horribly wrong and we have to wing it.

Robots don't wing it.