Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
- In the 1600s, a man named James Mattock was expelled from the First Church of Boston. His crime? It wasn’t using lewd language or smiling on the sabbath or anything else that we might think the Puritans had disapproved of. Rather, James Mattock had refused to have sex with his wife for two years. Though Mattock’s community clearly saw his self-deprivation as improper, it is quite possible that they had his wife’s suffering in mind when they decided to shun him. The Puritans believed that sexual desire was a normal and natural part of human life for both men and women (as long as it was heterosexual and confined to marriage), but that women wanted and needed sex more than men. A man could choose to give up sex with relatively little trouble, but for a woman to be so deprived would be much more difficult for her.
That was a good read. If there really were something to this, then wouldn't it be likely that in the past women would utilize male prostitutes and wouldn't there be historical records of male brothels that catered to women? I'm sure there must have been some, but not having looked into the matter, I can't think of a single one from any of the history I've studied.