a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by user-inactivated
user-inactivated  ·  4078 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Bayesian Statistics and What Nate Silver Gets Wrong

    I would argue that in science, it might be worthwhile to do a Fisher and a Bayes analysis, but unfortunately only Fisher (or some similar type test) is taken seriously.

I don't think this is the case anymore. Bayesian methods were fringe for a long time, but they've been mainstream for at least the last decade.





b_b  ·  4078 days ago  ·  link  ·  

In biology? I don't know. I read a lot of papers, and I can't tell you the last time I saw a Bayesian analysis.

user-inactivated  ·  4078 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I must have missed some context, I have no idea about biology. In statistics, Bayesian methods aren't controversial anymore.