On your recommendation I started his Communism: A History. Gotta tell ya - it reads a lot like a history of MoveOn.org as written by BIll O'Reilly... Pipes is mentioned in The Dead Hand as one of the ideologues who helped sustain the cold war an extra ten years. He pretty much starts off with the basis that Communism in all forms is stupid and will never ever work, and then proceeds to highlight things about Marxism/Leninism that are even stupider. Which is fine - the dude knows a hell of a lot more political philosophy than I ever will and Reagan never asked me to Tiger-Team CIA intelligence estimates. But it's far more of a polemic than an analysis.
There is no doubt that he is writing from a very distinct point of view (basically a staunch Neoliberal one), and he doesn't try to hide this fact. But that doesn't necessarily mean that he is incorrect on his version of history. After all communism hasn't worked anywhere its been tried. I suppose the difficulty for the reader lay in separating fact from conjecture from opinion. One has to also remember how ravaged his native homeland, Poland, was by the Communists. This plus the fact that stated the goal of the Bolsheviks was for a world government might make it difficult to have a lot of sympathy for their worldview. I think your comment in another thread yesterday that started "Dear Person Born in 1992" stated what I am trying to say quite well. Namely, that the world was minutes from MAD for a half century, and we therefore have to try to read everything from that time period in that light. Even if Pipes was responsible for the CW dragging on longer than it had to, he probably did it out of genuine love of the West and fear of the Soviets.
No doubt. Remember - I grew up in Los Alamos, NM. The W88 was designed by my peeps. Thing is, there's a lot more information available now than there was in 1984 and far more perspectives are available... yet Pipes' writing illustrates pretty clearly that he figured it all out back in the '70s and has been fitting all available information into his worldview ever since, rather than the other way 'round. I don't question his motives. I don't question his scholarship. I simply observe that his perspective is perhaps too archaic for my tastes, having grown up with the Soviets front'n'center and having adapted to a world in which they are not now, and never have been, the "Evil Empire."Even if Pipes was responsible for the CW dragging on longer than it had to, he probably did it out of genuine love of the West and fear of the Soviets.