Apparently SARS did evoke a pretty strong response in a lot of people. The guess is that because it elicits so much stronger of a response than a common cold, that the body built up a lot of antibodies. In one study, they could find antibodies in SARS patients up to 10 years later. We can only hope this is the same. Although I have no idea if only really sick people got strong antibodies or whether it was general. Obviously makes a big difference. Meanwhile dipshit Guiliani is on Fox News laughing about "How come we don't do contact tracing for heart disease and cancer?" For real. I don't want all the old people in Florida to die, because my mo is an old person in Florida, but for fuck's sake. Someone needs to save us from them.
Well that's good to know. I've seen far too many Ph.Ds posting shitty n=12 studies lately. First you stop rooting for the Browns in public. Eventually you stop rooting for the Browns even in private. At some point you forget that you were ever a fan of the Browns. The titular and spiritual head of the Republican Party is at drink bleach you'll be fine and at some point, even Jim Jones has breakaways.Apparently SARS did evoke a pretty strong response in a lot of people. The guess is that because it elicits so much stronger of a response than a common cold, that the body built up a lot of antibodies. In one study, they could find antibodies in SARS patients up to 10 years later.
Meanwhile dipshit Guiliani is on Fox News laughing about "How come we don't do contact tracing for heart disease and cancer?"