IMO this is just scandal for the sake of scandal. I mean you don't seriously think the FBI is going to come out and say that the president is a Russian agent. Even if it were true somehow it would have to be irrefutable like the Korean cult thing. The FBI couldn't even indicate Hillary when it was clear that she committed some serious crimes. So I don't see how this goes anywhere. It just makes the democrats look a little better to their core base and like idiots to the rest of the country.
Where is the irrefutable proof of Hilary's crimes? A lot of it comes down to the legal grey area surrounding her emails and the server. If you want to just speculate, then sure, she's as shady as they come. But in terms of proof, I've yet to see any.
That was my thought exactly (although I dispute the conclusion that Clinton had committed any "serious crimes").