So many examples of scotus being hopelessly corrupt.
I recall that "arbitration" was a big topic when I worked at my "last company." -It was also in the fine print that it would occur in NY, despite where the business that was disputing was HQ'd. -An even greater reason to not pursue litigation if you're HQ'd elsewhere.Some of the lawsuits involved small banking fees, including one brought by Citibank customers who said they were duped into buying insurance they were never eligible to use. Fees like this, multiplied over millions of customers, amount to billions of dollars in profits for companies.
Not done with the article yet, but I have to point out that I would sure like to have a link to more information about this particular case. I am not a fan of these "arbitration only" clauses, but I'm also not a fan of coddling consumers. My entire adult life I have been aware of the phrase, "buyer beware." Don't be stupid, do your due-diligence. That said, if a company is knowingly being deceitful, they should be punished under the law. I'd like to read more about this particular case.