Well, yes, and if you're a member of the Jersey Shore cast, then that'll be enough for you. Sure. But the visibility of a porn star is not the visibility of a politician? Would one want the other's? There's this thing called "reputational risk" that adults - I mean, sorry - business owners and people who work in businesses are aware of. It's the cost of lost business that negative publicivity can create. Are you saying visibility can't create negative publicity? All visibility is good? Tell that to Subway's Jared. No woman or minority fights for the 'privilege' that lesser quality work will be lauded over better product simply for the country of the issuer's origin. #fuckingrowupmangHe would get visibility while his "normal self" would not.
Visibility is powerful and nothing you can say can change that.
Pornhub and Brazzers disagree. Also, all visibility that's not critically bad is good. Jared cost Subway some reptutation. Rockstar paid money for GTA to have "bad visibility" and it increased sales. And no, they're not - at least most of them - but they ARE, however, try to pass off as incredibly discriminated against and victimized most of the time.Sure. But the visibility of a porn star is not the visibility of a politician?