i dot think that is a beneficial reason...i mean if richard hawking's dad thought i carry the gene for xyz, that woudlnt have benefited the species...right? not to say i am pro life, but in this case i don think you are the one who gets to decide which genes are important enough to pass on. you could be caring a gene that makes us resistant to some future strand of ebola or something. as far as the reason, its genetic. everything we are is in one way or another to preserve our genes. sharing resources, in any case, is only beneficial when it makes the likelihood of our genes survival more probable. so fear is an instinct that we might not have such a need for living in america suburbia, but we had much need for it 10000 years ago. and it has not faded. as with other genes that were present because they evolved to be dominant, they have kept themselves that way. so sexual desires and fear still dominate our actions. the issue and the confusion comes, in my opinion, when these genetic dominant traits dont line up with todays culture. becasue our genes say, dont share resources, but society sais...share away, its sinful not to. yes?
But I do, I'm afraid. This is a bold statement, and actually meshes well with a modern genetic study that identifies a set of 'warrior' genes, whose presence or absence up- or down-regulates biochemical aggression in the body. If you have the gene, you are more prone to take large risks, be more aggressive in all walks of life really, which, over millenia, leads to aggression being a highly selected for trait. I find it interesting you mention sin as a motivating force.i don think you are the one who gets to decide which genes are important enough to pass on.
the issue and the confusion comes, in my opinion, when these genetic dominant traits dont line up with todays culture.
faith is very powerful... and no, i dont think you get to decide. i think you put your sperm in there, and hope that the brown eyes show up. you or i dont decide which genes get passed down. if we did, then you woudl take the gene without the heart condition and throw it away adn have kids, right?
Yep. Still not worth it. I imagine a scenario, where my genetic child finds out that I knew everything I knew about my illness, it's inheritability, the high risk of death in adolescence, the restrictions it places on those who manage to survive to adulthood, and conceived them anyway. I knew that they had a high likelihood of suffering as I have suffered, and inflicted it upon them anyway. I can't claim ignorance, as my parents do. They had no idea what was in their genes, no one did, 22 years ago. We've left the topic I want to discuss though, which is responsibility.have you thought of that?
Hey TB, if you look in the upper right hand corner of the comment box when you are making a reply or a comment, you will see the "markup." -Click on it for a description.