A few more links on the story:
http://www.npr.org/2011/03/14/134492882/how-to-transform-the...
http://www.coetail.asia/jenanderson/2011/03/27/pi-fight/
and the legal case filing: http://dockets.justia.com/docket/nebraska/nedce/8:2011cv0012...
We had a good conversation until I asked why he thought Blake's composition was so similar to his, when they are not only structured differently, sound different, and presented differently. I asked what Blake had done to tick him off. I've gotten no reply. I can really only conclude that Lars has an inflated view of his own work, and this is perhaps tinged with jealously that Blake's became rapidly popular, landing him spots on NPR and millions of YouTube hits. Here's Blake's killer version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOQb_mtkEEE Lars' video he claims Blake copied: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzNlaxpD0zY You can compare!
Vi Hart's response: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJtLSLCJKHE&feature=relat...
It reminds me of the attempt to patent genes. But, the fight is not over yet: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-court-appeal-key-gene-pa... Both pi and genes are naturally occuring. Few things can stir up nonsense like a legal system.