First person, self-aggrandizing and still an engaging read.
Great read and holy shit that woman has balls. Attacking a troll like him is begging for more hatred and personal attacks from him. She's obviously naive but at the same time I give her kudos for being crazy enough to actually do something about it.
Nothing. He broke no laws. You run into this in the defaults - first-hand accounts of brushes with the Keyboard Kommandos. Bear in mind that the ones who actually get into the car and go somewhere are the Waffen SS of the Kommandos - the true believers, the deeply bored, the ones with some gumption. Even then, when you confront them they run and hide. Knew one guy who upset /b/ (his post was beating out their Navy SEALs copy pasta to be read by Samuel L Jackson). He came home and there was a dude standing next to his mailbox. The guy asked the stranger what the hell he wanted and the dude ducked eyes and walked away quickly. What's funny is the first time I ever heard the name "Hunter Moore" was when a buddy of mine started night classes at UCLA Law. There was a dude in his classes that was apparently infamous for being a total douche online - had a "revenge porn" website that had made him comparatively rich. Keep in mind that this friend of mine counts among his friends a guy who finished 2nd on the Bachelor and you can sense that his tolerance for douchebaggery is pretty high - but Hunter Moore really rubbed him the wrong way. Mr. Moore didn't last two quarters. Apparently his drive and zeal to take matters into his own hands and learn for himself what he could legally do just wasn't worth the hassle of, you know, studying for four years and taking the bar.
I just wanted to say I read this, thanks for posting it -- otherwise I wouldn't have known that that idiot's website was down, which is a very good thing. Should it be so hard to clean up the internet in such a small way? Sometimes I wish we could fast-forward to 2025 when we may actually have some good (or very bad) cyberlaw in place.