a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00
kleinbl00  ·  4936 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Richard Branson: Time to end the war on drugs
It works like this:

1) People are afraid of crime but don't understand it.

2) Politicians get voted in on the basis of things people are afraid of but don't understand.

3) Everyone votes to be "tough on crime" without having to explain or understand the repercussions of what that means.

4) Sentences increase and prison populations swell and the people cry out about the expense.

5) Politicians demonstrate how cheaply they're solving the problem by putting the task out to the lowest bidder.

6) "the lowest bidder" is usually the guy who knows best how to make money via overruns and cost-plus contracts because the government is stupid. I had a contractor underbid an auditorium install I designed by 50% - they told me later they straight-up forgot the wire. They still made a hell of a profit, though, because their change orders inflated the budget by 300%. Yay open public bids.

I would honestly say that the private prison system has nothing to do with the war on drugs. People don't want to incarcerate friends, loved ones and victims, they want to incarcerate "dangerous criminals." This is why crack was sold to America as crazy rocks that made Darky violent and why the Norman Rockwell portrait of the meth addict is some crazed guy with track marks who will knock your teeth out for a dollar. Remove the "violence" from the portrait of the American drug user and we don't put them in prison. However, the people who care the most about "justice" from an American standpoint tend to see "crime" as a synonym for "sin" and know that the way "sin" is dealt with is through "repentance" and "punishment."





mk  ·  4936 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I would honestly say that the private prison system has nothing to do with the war on drugs.

I agree with all the above but this.

I would be surprised if the private prison industry didn't give more money to candidates that pledged to get 'tougher on crime'. In that sense, I think they would help fund the propaganda behind the war on drugs, by rewarding candidates that seek to continue or expand it. Seeing as tougher illegal immigration legislation was penned by the private prison lobby, I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't do the same for drug-related laws.

http://www.npr.org/2010/10/28/130833741/prison-economics-hel...

b_b  ·  4936 days ago  ·  link  ·  
However, the people who care the most about "justice" from an American standpoint tend to see "crime" as a synonym for "sin" and know that the way "sin" is dealt with is through "repentance" and "punishment."

And there it is...The word penitentiary comes from "a place to do penance". That is, sit there and pray for forgiveness. As intemperance is a sin, we must incarcerate those who are intemperant so that they might ask for forgiveness. Talk about separation of Church and State! I'm always curious why its the atheists, who statistically have among the lowest crime rates of any "religious" (for lack of a better word) demographic, who are demonized. The believers cause the crime, because they know they can be forgiven by a third party.