followed tags: 18
followed domains: 0
badges given: 10 of 12
member for: 606 days
I tried to learn how to play shogi, but it doesn't look promising. My chess 'reflexes' take over and are very hard to ignore, leading to blunders and illegal moves. I also played Cold War: CIA vs KGB board game. Wouldn't recommend it, the game is basically blackjack on steroids (but with a theme). Next week we are going to rent Stronghold which sounds a lot more interesting.
Can't wait for this Friday's Call of Cthulhu session. We ended on a cliffhanger and right after very illuminating interrogation. All characters are associated with the Scotland Yard and the current investigation is about human trafficking with leads and motives that don't add up. So, you know, aliens from beyond reckoning (though we only know it metagame, so far we are very good at avoiding being out of character).
Well, I'm a native speaker and study maths. After about an hour of mucking about with pencil and paper I got 91 possible matches for the "abcd efgc hbijkd" and "abcd efgc hbijkdl", but no good ideas for "edj gopq(-)rfl". I'll do some formal analysis over this week and get back.
- For worse, there isn't as much readily available information on the spread of radioactive material in the event of an attack.
Would you mind expanding on what exactly do you need? I know a few people who study for radiation safety/radiometry inspectors and I could forward a bunch of your questions. Though, I don't know if EU stuff is going to be relevant.
I started collaborating with one of the doctoral students on a research project. We talked about our respective works over the last few weeks and noticed a few non-trivial similarities. At least we have hopes they aren't trivial. Right now we are going through the archives to check if it's indeed something new. I don't want to give away too many details as of yet, but he works on edge currents and junction effects in graphene whereas my work is about optical properties of 'bulk' graphene-BN structures.
Who knows, perhaps I'll be soliciting publishing advice sometime next year?
I won. 8.5 out of 10 - a new personal best with only one match left.
I've finished reading Durant vol. 3. Was it a lot of work? Not really, the secret seems to be pacing. So far it's ~2270 pages in 103 days which averages to about 22 pages per day. Assuming this rate as constant, I am now thirteen months away from finishing the series. And that's a lot of work. :P
Ever since I got my pair of glasses, the migraines passed. At least the worst parts of them. It's astounding how uncorrected astigmatism can influence your well-being.
Heart stuff isn't going as well, unfortunately. I'm quite anxious about my upcoming checkup. Hypotension is getting worse, 95/60 as of this morning. Standing for too long has become rather uncomfortable. I can still run like crazy, but simply standing for longer than 40 minutes is tiring. Don't ask me how it works, I don't get it either.
I got my hands on some caesium carbonate! It's not much, but it should work for my needs. What do I want to do? I'm going to check if I can cause saponification of (trace) esters in mineral oil. It shouldn't (and frankly didn't) happen anywhere near the standard conditions and with sodium or potassium hydroxide, but caesium hydroxide I plan on making might just be reactive enough to work.
True, but how often and for how long can one endure insults in exchange for arguments and plea for a discussion? There's a point where after thinking "should I say something" you immediately think "nah, I know how this song goes" and move along.
- Edit: awh :/
Undeleted. I was checking one thing, sorry.
"While there are two ways of contending, one by discussion, the other by force, the former belonging properly to man, the latter to beasts, recourse must be had to the latter if there be no opportunity for employing the former." - Cicero, being a fascist white male who said "man" instead of "people of all genders, orientations, sizes, races, religions and nations" ;)
You've done well. It's usually pointless to engage.
Thanks. I learned about it from the Exposing Pseudo-Astronomy Podcast. Half of his material can be traced back to some Coast to Coast AM guest.
Don't be fooled by 'podcast' in the name. It's one guy from NASA reading from a pre-made script. You can get full transcripts of almost all non-guest/interview episodes, and there are maybe 12 of those out of 166. I'm adding it more as a clarification than a recommendation.