Schiff's account was chilling. I watched most of it live, and found myself clinching my fists and furrowing my brow. I noticed that he only occasionally looked down at his notes, and his summary was largely formulated on-the-fly. This kept him from looking weak or inept, like almost everyone else (both sides) reading word-for-word off of a document in front of them, slipping in and out of the "reading mode" monotone so many people revert to. He imbued his statements with passion, when he felt it. There's at least one audible reaction from the audience (@8:14). Schiff laid waste to the GOP defense. He peeled back their ever-evolving layers of defense, with little embellishment, using indisputable evidence acquired solely during the public hearings within the last 8 days. My favorite part was him pointing out that the GOP would prefer we rely solely on what the president claims (somewhere around @13:20-ish). I wish he would have lingered a little longer here, and reminded everyone that this president has amassed an unprecedented amount of false claims during his tenure. I also enjoyed when he compared this Congress to the Congress during Nixon, a Congress that when presented with irrefutable evidence, found its spine and made a bipartisan decision to oust him. And he's right, Trump's is far and beyond Nixon's criminality. But despite his incredibly damning condensation of relevant materials, like I've said, it doesn't really seem to matter. The GOP's impeachment strategy is largely a referendum on the attitudes of their constituents, and the needle still hasn't moved (granted, the poll was probably taken prior to any measurable reaction from these public hearings). They won't turn on Trump. They seem intent on following him to either the death of the GOP, or the elevation of the executive to heights of power never imagined by anyone sympathetic to systems of checks and balances. Speaking of, I've even read some recent pieces by pro-Trump fuckers claiming that Congressional oversight has gone much too far, and we need to rescind executive oversight functions. These people are dangerous to the American experiment. Sometimes, their intellectual bankruptcy is evident in their poor prose alone. Seriously, one paragraph in an (Sheryl Atkisson? can't remember) opinion piece at The Hill (LOL, and their "opinion section" may be under investigation for providing John Solomon a vehicle on which to propagate conspiracies) began, "It is exactly what it is.", after the previous paragraph ended with something like "Schiff asks, 'How can this inquiry be a witch hunt?' ", or something like that. It's like, phew, that last sentence I just constructed was pretty bad, sure, but I'm a pseudonymous physicist on a lightly-trafficked forum. I don't identify as a democrat, but it's pretty fuckin' obvious which side is going to be shit on in the annals of history. I won't be voting for that side, and if the Senate acquits, I'll see you in the streets. Maybe kingmudsy could sling a little mud here too? :) Edit: As the inquiry and investigation phase of impeachment appear to have been completed (but see edit 2), the Senate GOP has probably assured Trump today that they intend to acquit him, clearing the way for the White House to "endorse" a Senate trial. I don't think the senate GOP members are lying to him, but it's possible. Either way, I'm sure 'bl00 is right, they'll use this to attempt inhibiting the campaigns of Sanders, Harris, Warren, and Booker. :( Edit 2: What if Schiff drops the mic (re: today), the Dems keep their ears to the ground for a couple of weeks, and say nothing of their future plans? All the while, they listen to polls, do press interviews/PR, etc. If the polls don't move, Pelosi makes an announcement, basically: "The beatings will continue until morale improves", and they bring forth any additional witnesses willing to testify, or even those we've seen already once again (if there's any willing), along with issuing another round of subpoenas to everyone obstructing (can you get hit with two counts of defying Congressional subpoenas?). If I'm the Dems, I'm asking myself "Did we go too fast once we made it to the public hearings?". Hah! Look at me, hoping beyond all hope that something, anything, can help pierce the right wing megabubble.
Regarding dropping the mic! You see the news about an associate coming forward willing to testify about Nunes? Man oh man do I want to see the ranking minority member under oath. Moo moo, motherfucker.
It's one thing for Nunes to investigate the Russia probe's origins, but it just came out, after your comment, Parnas is willing to testify that Nunes was involved in efforts to investigate the Bidens in Ukraine. My jaw has been on the floor. You're done, Devin! How fucking nuts do you have to be to go conduct completely unaccountable foreign policy on secret missions involving investigations of the Bidens, private U.S. citizens, circumventing the proper diplomatic and legal channels? Welp, not as fucking nuts as you'd have to be to then think you could properly serve as the second-ranking member on the congressional committee conducting the impeachment hearings into improper secret missions involving foreign investigations of the Bidens! This is crazier than even what I thought possible. I'm seriously floored right now, reeling. Watch Nunes's face when Swalwell reads the DailyBeast article, which had yet to include the information that it was an investigation into the Bidens that Nunes was chasing: edit: mk, found a funny bugski. I can embed this twitter link, but then if I go to edit the text, the page loads, and the paragraph order of all text in the comment has been inverted. i.e. for this post, if I were to simply press "edit", and then "update", without having edited anything, the embedded tweet would be at the top, and my opening statement at the bottom, with all the other paragraphs inverted as well. But listen, nothing involving twitter embeds should ever be considered urgent to any dev. :)
Agree, there's every reason to keep the inquiry rolling. Today, we had: 1. This Parnas-Nunes testimony thing. I suspect it may be that Parnas's illegal RNC/GOP re-election slush fund donations were used to fund Nunes's frivolous "defamation" lawsuits (moo moo!). Now that's hearsay, just my theory. EDIT: the biggest bombshell in weeks just went off. According to Parnas, in 2018, Nunes was involved, with Parnas, in secret attempts to persuade Ukraine to open investigations into the Bidens. omfg. This isn't proven, yet, but... wow. Just wow. 2. The NYTimes article I posted earlier today, revealing that the intelligence community briefed the Senate (presumably the Senate Intelligence Committee?) that Trump's Ukrainian conspiracy theories originate from a GRU (Putin) disinformation operation. 3. An early leak of the Dec. 9 DOJ IG report, which Trump supporters and even Trump himself have said will put Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Hillary, etc. behind bars, revealed a clerical error made by a lower-level lawyer on some paperwork, and no improper conduct surrounding the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. Still, we should wait for the entire report. I hope Parnas has documentation and corroborating testimony from others. It's not going to be easy for me to trust him. He's either a Russian operative, or has been led around by Russian operatives for a very, very long time.
Lev Parnas seems like the kind of guy who leaves a paper trail. Dude I just watched that video again and Lev Parnas' instagram feed consists of (A) a dog (B-ZZ) Compramat on Rudi Giuliani and Donald Trump. It is completely fucking empty of everything else.
"Tell me more about that dog, though. We need to investigate the dog." - the GOP