a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by humanodon
humanodon  ·  4218 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Seventeenth Weekly "Share Some Music You've Been Into Lately" Thread

How do you mean?





user-inactivated  ·  4216 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I'm not sure. But at one point (circa thickfreakness? great record) the Black Keys cared about the blues more than they did the rock, in my opinion. Now they don't. This guy cares about the blues, but he leans to the jazzy soul side of things. It's much truer to 1955, either way.

humanodon  ·  4216 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Ah, I see your point. Although as musicians, the Black Keys and Nick Waterhouse are primarily concerned with creating new music, insofar as they're interested in creating their music. Sometimes I think of the progression of music as a sort of biological or evolutionary process. Blues is an ancestor of rock and roll, which is an ancestor of rock. Blues is also an ancestor of jazz, which is also an ancestor of rock and roll and of course rock.

The Black Keys and Nick Waterhouse may make music that expresses recessive musical traits, but it's very much modern music. If Nick Waterhouse were to go back to 1955 people might not recognize what he does as being "true" to the music of the day. Others might clearly see the connection, but the difference would likely be apparent to them as well.

The post-modern ideas of how art can be made includes these time travelling moments, that is, the ability to create new works by using elements of prior works. Though the works may be similar or close to works from other eras, the conscious choice in selecting the work's execution shape the intent behind the piece and that's something that defines the contemporary world of the arts.

user-inactivated  ·  4215 days ago  ·  link  ·  

    The Black Keys and Nick Waterhouse may make music that expresses recessive musical traits, but it's very much modern music. If Nick Waterhouse were to go back to 1955 people might not recognize what he does as being "true" to the music of the day. Others might clearly see the connection, but the difference would likely be apparent to them as well.
This is interesting. I wonder just how well-received something like Waterhouse's style would be in '55, or maybe, in a different genre, how popular a modern Sinatra-style singer like Buble would be. There are, I'm sure, subtleties that would be picked up on.

I particularly like "recessive musical traits."