Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
I feel similarly. The choice I see myself facing is that Yang has a massive advantage in "less damaging" because he doesn't bring the party baggage with him. And that will make me that guy voting for Trump by voting for Yang.
I haven't made that leap yet. I see harm reduction as meaning on an outcome basis, not on a theoretical basis. I think Yang would be a really good leader, and I was on his bandwagon as a presidential candidate. I also see his chances as slim-to-none at the moment, so voting for him wouldn't lead to a good outcome. If that calculus changes, I would change my stance in a heartbeat, and I hope that comes to pass.