I agree that I am giving one side of the argument; I think it is a side that gets less attention and should be included in a balanced discussion. Regulation has benefits and costs; alternatives to regulation have benefits and costs. When you say "There's trade-offs with every one of these regulatory decisions" you have expressed 90% of what I want to say. Trade-offs are almost inevitable in complex environments, and it's hard to make fair evaluations. I think there is a common tendency to over-value intentions rather than results, and to overlook large but inconspicuous effects. Mainly I find it fascinating to look into these subjects and learn what snake oil actually was, and that the FDA permits prescription-based homeopathic remedies for grave illnesses. Thank you for sharing your thoughts; in particular I had not heard of the Drug Efficacy Study Implementation.You're presenting a lot of this data from the point of view of your conclusion