a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00
kleinbl00  ·  3137 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Bitcoin is not an obvious choice for financial services.

Banks like to corrupt the ledger, though. That's how they roll. They have no vested interest in public trust, and if their instrument of public trust is a vehicle associated with drug deals, terrorism and blackmail they gain nothing from it.

I'd argue that the banks have more incentive to make a database and call it a blockchain than adopt a blockchain and use it as a database.





mk  ·  3137 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Well, I do assume they will eventually go down the path of collusion. That's what they do.

That said, right now they could all share a SQL database and each have read/write access to it. But I have to assume that someone, whether a regulator or someone from their own legal team, would object to that kind of a setup.

UPDATE: IBM wants to be the one.

http://pastebin.com/c7jQmtsU

user-inactivated  ·  2480 days ago  ·  link  ·  
This comment has been deleted.
kleinbl00  ·  3137 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Yep. By building their own private blockchain they have the power of obfuscation. By using the existing blockchain they can be audited by the public.

user-inactivated  ·  2480 days ago  ·  link  ·  
This comment has been deleted.