Yeah, I read that thread. It didn't seem nearly as conclusive as the title suggests. The best point I saw was that being able to shoot a lot of things quickly was a bit more helpful (until the rise of the longbowman) than being able to shoot the occasional thing from a long distance. At the very least, both are valid skillsets. They also wandered into a discussion about whether what he was doing could puncture chainmail, ignoring the fact that most of a medieval archer's targets wouldn't have had any, including many knights. Anyway, the interesting part is that if you had asked me yesterday whether I thought Legolas' back-quiver thing was the most efficient way to store arrows before shooting, I would have said yes. But in retrospect, that seems entirely wrong.
In every account of archers I've ever seen, they hold their arrows like this: As in, "come for me fuckers I'll be right here." That guy ain't doin' a lot of running and jumping. I'm with 'em on the chainmail bit. Yeah, most targets wouldn't be wearing any but 10 lbs of push behind a field point will bounce off drywall, let alone trees. It'll stab a foamcore target just fine but as far as actually doing anything useful in the way of death'n'such, not unless you're a squirrel. I have no doubts that the dude can run and jump and do all sorts of impressive things with a bow. I don't think that means we need to rethink everything about archery. Bows just aren't designed for melee no matter how nifty it looks in the movies.