Yet another tale of how government/single organized entities will eventually be outdone and overtaken by competition between businesses. Government is good for doing things where nobody else wants to do them, setting standards in an economy, and giving taxes. Not much else.
I disagree with this line of thinking. Government is an organization that represents a collective of people. It is not fundamentally flawed, but can be poorly organized or misapplied. Good governance is essential to a civil society, and to distrust 'government' in general is to limit the possibility of better governance.
Government is a single entity guided by taxpayer dollars rather than incentive to further itself. Taxpayer dollars will only be decreased by the economy doing badly. The government has little incentive to push endlessly to innovate more. When there is competition with another government, it will fund and push nasa forward, but when there isn't, it won't. Companies, when prevented from forming monopolies through either government intervention breaking up large companies or lack of government intervention stopping them from forming, will more consistently have more competition and reason to push forward. Government is good as a tool to push for a goal when you don't want the search for profit getting in the way. Funding otherwise unprofitable research, healthcare for the poor, etc. It is not good as a tool to replace systems that can work fine while chasing a profit.
I agree with that. However, I don't see that the private sector has the incentive to cover all of our needs when it comes to space exploration. They will likely play a part, but I think that some goals will only be achieved by a government funded body. Much of what NASA does is akin to unprofitable research.It is not good as a tool to replace systems that can work fine while chasing a profit.