a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by user-inactivated
user-inactivated  ·  3563 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: ISINGLASS: the Mach-22 Mcdonnell-Douglas followup to the SR-71 that never flew

I have a copy of Skunk Works somewhere in the piles and piles of books over here. I'm still kicking myself all these years later for missing Irwin in '89 for the 20'th anniversary. A few of the astronauts were giving a talk about 100 miles from me, and I said "I'll wait for them to come to town and get a signature then." Moral of the story there is "He who hesitates loses."

I think of Kelly Johnson as the Isaac Newton of aerospace. Both were in tune with the universe in ways that I am not able to describe. About the only aircraft designer outside of that circle is Burt Rutan. Did you know that Spaceship One was the first aircraft not funded by a government to break the sound barrier?





kleinbl00  ·  3563 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Friend's husband's summer job was cleaning up at Scaled as a kid. His aunt was the bookkeeper for 20 years.

The idea that SS1 wasn't funded by the government is a bit of a misnomer... Scaled gets 80% of its funding from Black AF coffers. Does this art look familiar?

user-inactivated  ·  3561 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I wish I could make that in Kerbal Space Program. This thread had me searching online for all the weird aircraft ideas people came up with in the 60's and 70's. My favorite new airframe is The Breadbox as it is a complete "WTF why not?" solution to a problem.

And I can imagine sweeping the floors at Scaled was amazing. Beats running the beer and soda cooler for a crappy grocery store for sure.

Paul Allen paid to build SpaceShipOne which is where this claim comes from. The point being made is that this is the first time a plane broke the sound barrier after being build not for a government contract. Yea, they got fed money, all these companies do/did. I guess if we want to be technically correct, then even Thrust SSC was not privately funded as they used RAF F4 engines that they "borrowed" for the car. Something tells me that you know all of this and we could go on for a bit about airframes for hours.

kleinbl00  ·  3561 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Dude. Do I have the site for you.

I understand the point being made and it's a genuine one. I'm a big booster of SpaceX et.al and an avid spectator of it all. A lot of the time I just throw a partial non sequitor out there to prompt better discussion.

Like the Rockwell breadbox.

I should really start playing Kerbal Space Program. Problem being, I'm a casual console guy with a 92" projection screen and I haven't hooked a PC up to it.