I wholeheartedly agree that the #1 issue here is faith in the FDA. Unfortunately this country is in a love affair with profit-driven everything, including determination of federal safety regulations. I am in biomedical research, and friends and family have asked me about vaccines. I never mock them. Basically, I tell them that I am not completely trustful of the FDA, or some western medical practices, particularly the over-prescription of pharmaceuticals. However, there are some vaccines that have a long track record of safety, and are critical to prevent some deadly and debilitating diseases. I tell them that I think it would be dangerous to skip those vaccines. I am not very familiar with the schedule, but I have been told that it has gotten more aggressive. I'm going to consider spacing it out as much as possible with our kid. It seems common sense that stacking immune stimulants could be worse than spreading them out. But, I might be wrong on that, and I'm going to look into it. Let me know if you or your wife knows anything about this. I know that taking the time to understand people's fears, and educating them is a more effective way to deal with the issue than mocking and debating them. However, although people have certain rights even when based in irrational belief, those rights diminish when it hurts other people. My willingness to be understanding of irrational belief is going to drop pretty quick when someone is risking the health of my child. But absolutely, we need to steer the entire conversation onto greater scrutiny of the FDA, and getting the fuck tons of money that influence the FDA out. In fact, I think our #1 problem in this country is corporate influence of policy. So many of our problems spin out of that.
And that buffoonery - which I've been having out with #b_b - is the problem. Just so you're aware, spacing out your kids' vaccine schedules officially makes you a part of the "anti-vax movement." There are pediatricians who will refuse to see your kids. It is my formal opinion that any product that requires a prescription to purchase should not be allowed to advertise. If I could point at one point in history where it all started spinning out of control, that's the spot I'd point at.
I can live with that if there's good reason for it. Which I would like to know more about, but I'm not getting much on PubMed. It is my formal opinion that any product that requires a prescription to purchase should not be allowed to advertise. It's also the formal opinion of every government in the World except for ours and New Zealand: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmaceutical_marketing#To_use... As an aside, for anyone that doubts the value of the chicken pox vaccine, they should talk to someone that has neuropathy due to shingles. My grandmother lived with excruciating pain for a decade. I'm glad I caught the chicken pox, although I was 18 and it was hell on earth.