a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by shanoxilt
shanoxilt  ·  3716 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: A Geeky Problem: Queer Terminology for a Constructed Language

Yes, but we are trying to foster inclusiveness at an early stage so we can prevent this.





JakobVirgil  ·  3716 days ago  ·  link  ·  

foster it in who?

shanoxilt  ·  3716 days ago  ·  link  ·  

In new Lojbanists and the general Lojbanic language.

JakobVirgil  ·  3716 days ago  ·  link  ·  

It is a test of the Worf/Sapir Hypothesis keep me informed.

shanoxilt  ·  3716 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Most linguists agree that the Sapir-Worf Hypothesis is either untestable or obviously false. We're just looking to allow logic to be easier to express.

JakobVirgil  ·  3716 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I agree with false but it seems embedded in the question.

Couldn't one just choose a number of lexical gaps and assign them to the categories?

or go with 'likes men' 'likes women' 'likes men and women'?

shanoxilt  ·  3695 days ago  ·  link  ·  

That has been suggested, but it opens a can of worms.