a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by mk
mk  ·  3787 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals

Yes, that's pretty much it. Top-tier journals are very interested in a high number of citations for their articles. That's how they achieve a high "Impact Factor" which has become the measure of a journal's influence. They publish interesting and significant science, but favor hot topics over less popular areas of research.

Journals are outdated, and they are dying. Their purpose was distribution, and currently, they actually hinder it more than they aid it.





stacker  ·  3787 days ago  ·  link  ·  

If I cancel my subscriptions to the aforementioned journals where else can I find new primary research on a weekly basis? Links to sources would be really appreciated.

mk  ·  3786 days ago  ·  link  ·  

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/

All manuscripts with NIH funding must be open access within a period, which I think is 6 months. For example, you'll see a link in the top right that says Free in PMC, where you can get a free copy.

You can create an account, and get alerts of new articles based on keywords, etc.

PLOSOne is a free multidisciplinary journal that is Open Access. A lot of very good research appears in this journal. PLOS has several journals, all of which are open access (free online).

stacker  ·  3786 days ago  ·  link  ·  

Thanks! I check pubmed quite often but I didn't know that PLOSOne also had open access journals.

b_b  ·  3786 days ago  ·  link  ·  

The PLoS model is the future. Open access will be the only thing we do soon enough, I hope. I look forward to the day we can laugh at the backward time when journals ruled science.