Yeah I read that (it's linked at the bottom of the 1d4chan post). The game's authors responded to that review (also linked), and it's the frightening love child of /r/iamverysmart and /r/justneckbeardthings. What's especially telling IMO is that they don't really bother to defend e.g. the homophobia (such as a low speech ability being described as "gay") or misogyny (e.g. women's physical abilities drop as they become more attractive), but really focus on the rule choices. I don't know if they realized that some of it was indefensible or just didn't realize they were being criticized.