a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00

I pay to get reports from George Friedman's thinktank. They send me about eight emails a day. It's a commitment but it's usually thought-provoking. Once a week they send out a "what we're reading."

Last week, the three books on their list were the three books I had most recently read.

I've talked about Toland's Rising Sun before. b_b - we've discussed Hiroshima. After Rising Sun and Japan 1941 I have even less sympathy for the "no nukes" standpoint. Japan suffered strategic and tactical defeat in every conflict after Pearl Harbor and still fought tooth and claw because surrender was dishonorable. The military faction undertook an armed coup to depose the emperor after Nagasaki. Upon reading Toland, there is no responsible way to regard Japan as a rational actor and ample evidence that the only way forward was to utterly break them as a nationality. We stopped at two because they surrendered unconditionally. We could have gone to five before needing to build more bombs. There were Russian considerations to be sure but the principle drive on the American side was to end the war - we talked about the firebombing of Tokyo but we haven't talked about how it was diplomatically ineffective.

The other two books discussed were Books 1 and 2 of Ken Follett's Century Trilogy. It's easy, it's fluffy, it's accessible, it's Downton Abbey writ large across WWs I and II from the perspectives of British aristocracy, German aristocracy, Russian peasants, Welsh coal miners and American businessmen.

Follett knows how to write page-turners that don't leave you feeling stupid. They don't leave you feeling smart, either - they leave you feeling like you were there.





b_b  ·  2192 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I recently read Rising Sun, and then I followed it up with Masuo Kato's The Lost War, and frankly, it swayed my opinion on the bomb from "bad idea" to somewhere on the "good idea" side of ambiguous. Even more interesting than the bomb was the bombing campaigns. Toland and Kato (whom I believe Toland must have been using heavily for source material) both point out that the US went far out of its way to inform the population exactly where the bombs were going to fall and when. This is in opposition to a lot of the apparently revisionist history I've read that tried to claim that the point of the firebombings was to terrorize civilians. In fact, it was to limit Japan's warmaking ability by targeting the mom and pop shops where a lot of the machinery was made, and these shops were often two to five man operations that existed throughout the neighborhoods. You can't help but feel good about America after doing these readings to find out just how well we treated our vanquished enemies, even though they sure didn't show us the same respect. The average Japanese citizen had fuckall to do with the decision to go to war, and all credit goes to the US government and armed forces for treating them as such. They turned their anger toward their own government after the war, and that was the right place for it.