I don't know that I agree. The shot is actually a very well composed line-out - the cobbles recede to infinity and the tower and tree line recede to the same point, which happens to be the sun. I might be tempted to rule-of-thirds it a little better but cropping is going to happen at the editorial stage anyway. When you consider that the shot largely exists to sell the beauty of the cobblestones it works really well; if you were to use this shot in editorial the bottom half of the image is available for copy. If the goal wasn't the cobblestones I'd fuckin' silhouette every human and tree in it. They're too muddy and disorganized to feature. Rather than making them pop I'd try to will them into oblivion. elizabeth - this would be a great use for an ND filter because if you had like an 80% or 90% gray on there, and shot into the sun, you could get a sky in one shot, get a long exposure on the tiles in another, and in that long exposure you'd have motion blur on the humans such that they suggested movement without being more than stand-ins for traffic. If she did want to tweak the saturation on the girls you'd do it with the brush tool. That rock wasn't nearly that red in the captured file, nor was the grass that green. But it sure as fuck was to my eye, so it sure as fuck got tweaked.This girls in the photo are the focal point, and their color is washed out and flat.
Yup rule of thirds has been a struggle. Submitted pictures with 1/3 cobblestones = not enough cobble stones was the feedback 2/3 cobblestones pictures are harder to pull off so they don't look too boring. And then i start running into depth of field problems where i got to do multiple shots to later blend everything in focus. (Which i still need to pull off successfully - tried a couple times today but turns out i need to take more pictures than i anticipated for everything to be sharp) Taking pretty pictures is significantly easier than taking pretty pictures of x. But with all the tutorials I've been watching and all you guy's help, I'm improving fast imo :) I feel like todays work is a lot better: https://imgur.com/a/RrH7F Still working at turtle pace in lightroom. Doesn't help my usual shortcuts don't work and sometimes mess up something when they correspond to some other action.
Ctrl-Z is your friend in Lightroom. Slap it like you're playing Space Invaders. If you need more depth-of-field you need to shoot at a higher stop. f/22, f/28 will solve all DOF problems. It will also suck away all light. Tripod. Shutter release cable. You need to get closer to the ground. If you're looking to make those cobblestones pop, get fuckn' on 'em. I've got a Bogen 3221 (that, I realize, is maybe a little older than you are) and one of the coolest things is it's got tripod threads on the bottom of the riser, too... which means you can mount your quick release down there, drop the camera upside down, and literally have it on a tripod half an inch above the ground. 
Yeah, thank god Ctl-Z works everywhere! I was shooting at the highest stop for most the shots - but the really close stones are still not in focus perfectly. Maybe i'm just being picky... Got that tripod and shutter release so all should be good. Scored the good manfrotto stuff, it doesn't do any fancy flips but is pretty solid :)