I agree that trying to parse meaning from the document in this sense is ridiculous, but unfortunately it's as far as I know the most major law on the subject. I disagree that all or none are the only options - maybe I think that gun control (as a society) reflects how comfortable we are with access and types of weapons - a sort of collective morality. I don't think there's a breakdown of which guns are "moral" or "immoral" for me, and for most people, I'm guessing. It seems difficult to discern how much danger is posed to me as a non-gun owning member of society by the accessibility and type of guns available - and since it's likely a continuum, it will be hard to determine how to respond to that. I would hope to view things rationally, but I do think trying to minimize gun violence while keeping in mind people's rights to guns is a combination of rational thoughts - I don't think one needs to supersede the other.
I would hope to view things rationally, but I do think trying to minimize gun violence while keeping in mind people's rights to guns is a combination of rational thoughts - I don't think one needs to supersede the other.
This is pretty much my exact feelings. I like this a lot.