I'm not American, so I don't follow the latest political developments as closely as you, undoubtedly, do. However, this seems an empty blanket term the likes of which we have seen being thrown around all throughout this election season. Mind expanding on it a bit?
Here you go: http://newobserveronline.com/clinton-destroy-syria-israel/ Search for the number of killed to date. A completely functioning (much to their chagrin) country has been reduced to rubble; engineered mass migration (ala Stalin), etc. This is a micro portrait of a psychopath (shades of M. Albright's 500,000 death Iraqi children being "worth it"):
This document has circulated in my feed before... if you do a little poking around, you'll find that she wasn't the one to write it. It's a bit unfair to pin an entire country's collapse and the complex powers at play on one person based on one forwarded email.
I fully agree with you regarding sole responsibility. Our "peace prize winner" is also a war criminal. At this I am going to take a deeper look at Jill Stein of Green party to see if anything smells in that quarter but under no circumstances will I give implicit ok to these monsters -- "red" or "blue".
Look, you just side-stepped the issue, that a your link as evidence of Hillary's war crimes is not really evidence at all, by countering that another person is also a war criminal. I'm not going to bother engaging you further if that's the amount of effort you're going to put into this discussion.
We'll need a tribunal for "evidence". Or maybe "Russia" will leak some evidence. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/hillary-clinton-and-the-s_b_9231190.html https://consortiumnews.com/2015/09/29/hillary-clintons-wicked-syrian-choice/?print=pdf anyway, I'm sure you can use a search engine, right?