Hm. Looks like I didn't specify my comment was centered around Sanders, and explicitly state some bits. I'll have to include those in the future. Thanks for the check. On a note of the emails you brought up, I'm like to think along the lines of sp00ns. Surprised much of this was news to people. There's a reason congressional approval ratings are so low. The fact that they explicitly state this much info in their emails only adds to the bit. And on a complete side, not really one to care for the whole Clinton email debacle. This gives me pause to that notion. Not likely to take up arms as it were, but if this is the content of the system tasked with anointing a presidential candidate, then what would be in those emails of the candidate to be?