EvoAnth, I started reading their rebuttal to you and I have to say, you really ought not give them the fodder they crave. By insulting the museum which you've never actually visited you gave them means by which to attempt to discredit everything else you wrote. -Don't get me wrong, you're likely right about how you described the museum but perhaps a lesson was learned. Stick to the science, the facts and leave the non first hand opinions of them aside. I'm sure their pseudo science says enough. Allow the reader to form their opinion based on that. But my question is, why attempt to have a dialog with them when there can be absolutely no swaying their opinion? The entire foundation of their "science," is that they have the only eyewitness account of creation on their side. -It's mad, they're mad. It's a deal-breaker.