I understand your point and agree that there is only so much you can plan for and prevent against. But I'm kind of gonna have to go against you and francopoli here, for a minute. In a nutshell, if a warehouse catches on fire, that's a tragedy. If a warehouse catches on fire and people die because the main and secondary fire exits were inexplicably locked, the sprinkler system malfunctioned, and the building hasn't been brought up to code for the past fifteen years, that's a disaster that could have been mitigated if the people in charge were being responsible, and if it turns out they were being negligent, they deserve every fine and every word of scorn that comes their way.

This isn't the only article that I've read that has discussed this, in regards to Harvey. I read similar articles when Katrina happened. Hell, there's Haiti and the earthquakes. Chances are, the discussion will come again Irma hits Florida. You've shared maps of Louisana's disappearing coastline and I'm almost certain there have been conversations on here about how the disappearance of marshland has a negative impact in buffering against the weather.

These conversations need to happen, more on the local level than the national level, but they still need to happen. Because where I'm sitting from, this is just more about people in control kicking the can down the road and trying to get away with what their predecessors got away with because "Hey, those plans were in the works well before I took office. It's not my problem bro."