Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
johnnyFive, IANAL, but my understanding, which is consistent with the summaries on Wikipedia, is that the only times sites have lost immunity under Section 203 was where when they explicitly provided support for doing something illegal (roommates.com allowing users to select discriminatory criteria), actually wrote some of the content themselves (www.badbusinessbureau.com), or where just publishing content wasn't the issue (ModelMayhem.com not warning users about a known rapist). Does this post sound plausible to you, assuming that changing "fuck /u/spez" to "fuck u/someoneelse/" isn't itself an issue?