I disagree, because the Imus map provides more detail. Perhaps it would help to view the map itself. Click full screen. The Imus map has information about:
1. The tree density
2. The terrain
3. The population-dense places
4. City features
Among other things. The NG map does not have this information. So comparing between two maps of the same size, the Imus map has a much greater amount of information without sacrificing clarity or readability.