Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
A couple semesters ago, I had a class in which I was assigned to write a research paper about some aspect of the Bible's Old Testament. I tossed around the idea of writing about Julian Jaynes's theory and its implications for the earliest books of the Bible, but I couldn't come up with anything to say that Jaynes hadn't already said (except 'man, wouldn't that be cool.') I'm skeptical, especially since there's not really any way to prove Jaynes right or wrong. Still, wouldn't it be cool?