a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by steve
steve  ·  5295 days ago  ·  link  ·    ·  parent  ·  post: Analog vs. Digital
Even though I'm a vinyl nerd, I found that piece a little condescending. While I agree that the major issues are convenience and fidelity, I don't think one necessarily overshadows the other. I've been thinking about this for several days. What is "listening to music"? when, why, where, and how do we "listen to music"? These thoughts are still forming in my head, but this is where I am at the moment:

1) Active Listening. The conscious choice to sit and listen. We put a record on, sit in a chair, and listen. Usually from speakers - maybe some people prefer headphones. But it is a choice. Sitting and listening is the activity. Maybe you looked at liner notes and artwork, but the sensory experience of listening is the primary activity.

2) Passive listening. The casual choice to listen while doing something else. It's music in the background while you clean, read, work out, rest, etc.

Technology has made passive listening so inexpensive and convenient. It is possible to listen to relatively high quality music 24 hours a day. The thing that has been on my mind is, does anyone actively listen anymore? I do, but it is a lot less frequent than it used to be. That has a lot to do with family and employment responsibilities, but I still find it interesting to think about.

Has the convenience of listening taken away from the experience of listening to music? It's arguable that the same concept applies to films as well. Because of the developments in home theater technology and DVRs, people may not sit down and watch a film (or TV show) in its entirety. It's easy to pause it and grab a snack, go to the bathroom, or even resume it the next day, as opposed to "being stuck" watching in a theater.

Is it a good thing? is it a bad thing? I know the author was really talking about analog vs. digital... but at some point it needs to be acknowledged that a large portion of the population can't even discern between a decent MP3 or AAC encoding and a CD or even vinyl, let alone 16-bit vs. 24-bit sound. And an even smaller portion of the population cares.

-end ramble





thenewgreen  ·  5282 days ago  ·  link  ·  
I like the direction this thread has gone in. I like the classification of active/passive listening. -I do both often. Although from an audio perspective, I can get just as much enjoyment actively listening to my ipod as I can a record. The difference comes from the other senses -the smell of antiquity, holding the jacket in my hand and reading the liner notes. There is a nostalgia there that is lost with the mp3 player. I wonder if 20 years from now, children will wax poetic about the feel of an ipod and seeing the songs title/album artwork on the screen?

The reason I posted the article to begin with was not because I'm a die hard audio-file (my record player sucks and I have crappy speakers) it was out of appreciation for the analogy describing the way digital sound is captured compared to analog. I liked the example of listening to someone speak and imagining that every 5th word or so would be missing. -I'm certain its an over simplification of the process but it still hit home for me.

Happy listening to you, whether it be active or passive!

mk  ·  5294 days ago  ·  link  ·  
By that definition, I almost never actively listen to music. I do passively listen quite a bit, however. I'm one of those people that probably can't tell the difference between a good MP3 or a CD. I do think that vinyl has a unique sound, but I wonder if I am up for the Pepsi challenge on that one too.

On that tag, the type of music I would choose to actively or passively listen to probably differs too. -So in that case, the medium could be changing our tastes in music.

I've seen tests where audiofiles couldn't tell the difference between music sent over very expensive Monster cables compared to wire hangers. Having some physics knowledge, it's easy to understand why. There must be some independent tests regarding these different formats, hopefully informed by some knowledge of our auditory anatomy. I'm curious now. I'll try to find what I can.