a thoughtful web.
Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking.   Login or Take a Tour!
comment by kleinbl00

I think the Biden administration was going to be criticized no matter what they did on this one. Had they supported deposits, they're soft soyboys who are only there for their woke leftist donors. Had they let the deposits burn, they're anti-innovation bureaucrats who are willing to spend billions in pork barrel for the CHIPS act but have no understanding of the vitality of small entrepreneurs. Had they supported investors, they're oligarchist cronies hell bent on preserving the moneyed class against the proletariat. Had they let investors burn, they're anticapitalist bureaucrats who do not properly support the market.

Bernanke was 100% at "anything but the Great Depression" in 2008. This was due to the fact that he wrote his doctoral thesis on the Great Depression. As a result, we got helicopter money for rich people at any cost for any reason. Now I don't know, but I suspect, that at least a few people over the weekend said words to the effect of "What if - and work with me here - what if Occupy Wall Street and The Tea Party... but in a post-BLM, post-Jan6 environment where we're in a proxy war with Russia" and after everyone plucked their silk boxers out of their colons they all set about to the diligent task of threading the needle.

Here's the thing that the money is just starting to realize:

    “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.”

Bitcoin is up stupid right now, like 20% in 3 days. Circle? I mean... there are three banks that didn't do as well as a stablecoin.

And the stablecoin that everyone's been predicting the demise of? Tether is un-fucking-shaken.

I think we're maybe six weeks before "DeFi" starts getting talked about as "shadow finance" because there will be enough big players who are flat-footed enough to recognize an actual innovative threat to really get the Wurlitzer going.





b_b  ·  398 days ago  ·  link  ·  

You and I both know that the WSJ editorial board and all of conservative media would find a way to criticize Biden if he came out tomorrow and said, "Yes, Hunter and I sold out the USA to China and as penance I'm resigning and I'll spend all of my remaining days after my jail sentence is over volunteering at an orphanage that caters to kids with special needs." But that doesn't mean they don't have a point here in the one specific instance. If their goal was preventing panic, the best thing they could have done was trot out the president to say, "We're doing nothing beyond the basic FDIC mandate, because there's no systemic risk here since SVB and Signature were gambling houses and the dice came up snake eyes. The average American's money is safe and sound." He's not preventing panic, and he's making it look more and more like the conservative talking points that Dems are a bunch of rich lawyers who care only about rich lawyers is basically true. I think they fucked up big time.

kleinbl00  ·  398 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I dunno, man. The firehose of economic data I point at my face every morning is a giant stack of spooky shit. I think the fact that 2009 wasn't straight sorted has everyone jumping at loud noises. I agree with you - the Biden administration is gonna get pilloried no matter what but if you take a look at the WSJ's targeted stream of vitriol it's all about Powell. Believe it or not, they seem to hate interest rates more than they hate Democrats in this moment.

b_b  ·  398 days ago  ·  link  ·  

You'll remember that Yellen wanted to raise rates in 2018 or whenever, so Trump didn't renominate her in favor of Powell. Then when Powell was like, "yeah she was right" Trump threatened to fire him, too, until he got in line. Clearly that was Murdoch whispering through Hannity directly into Trump's ear. They don't have that direct line anymore, so they have to just browbeat him in the media.

kleinbl00  ·  398 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I remember this for damn sure.

b_b  ·  398 days ago  ·  link  ·  

I do not. So many lols.