In my opinion, you are looking at one of the more brilliant applications of metafiction in a very, very long time.
The future of sports betting is happening with 100% free picks at TopMarketSports.com ------------------ J.P. Evans is a grizzled Wall Street veteran who applies stock market strategies to picking sports winners. He's recommending a play on UCF +4.5 this afternoon. Central Florida hits the road to visit Maryland in a game that will be broadcast on Fox Sports 1. Just a short time ago, both of these programs were in the dumps. UCF is not long removed from their infamous 0-12 campaign in 2015. And until recently, Maryland was considered the laughing stock of the Big Ten. But fortunes have changed for the two schools, which are both led by brilliant second year head coaches. So what's the difference? Who's got the edge? Terp fans are extremely excited about the early play of true freshman Kasim Hill at quarterback. He was electric against Towson, but this will be his first start against an FBS team. J.P. is betting that the youngster gets a rude awakening to big time college football today. He says, "The key to the game and the number is the Hill kid...he's being drastically overvalued here."
Oh wow, I'm glad this got bumped up to the top of my feed. I would've completely missed it otherwise. That was brilliant read. It's one thing to conceive the bizarre idea of continent size games of American football (as well as all the different forms these take), but to weave that into a meaningful narrative is quite impressive. I guess it reflects what Juice said about weird being good if it's in service of something. kb, you said in another comment that this was "one of the more brilliant applications of metafiction in a very, very long time." What other works would you recommend?
I figured as much. That's always the risk when you're purposely trying to write self-conscious, 'clever' material. You can get so focused on trying to be 'clever' that you forget to actually write something good. I had same problem when I first started writing lyrics. I was trying so hard to say something wise and original, that it just ended up sounding vapid and meaningless. Not that my lyrics are that great now, but at least they're honest. Then I guess that leads on to what Gardner was saying in the post you linked. That just because something is popular in the mainstream, it doesn't mean that it can't also be clever and insightful. Even the stuff that is actually garbage has it's value, as Werner Herzog talks about in this interview: One last related thing is that the writing style of the story in the OP made me think of Infinite Jest at some points. And there's an interesting David Foster Wallace quote that I think acts as a nice accompaniment to Gardner: And now here I am sat wondering whether this post I've written is just me trying to sound clever, haha. I'll have a look into Howard the Duck, thanks.The poet or the filmmaker or the musician must not avert his eyes. We should not be sitting in the library and study it as academic subject... Paul I think you've started watching Wrestlemania... because you must not avert your eyes. This what is coming at us. This is what a collective, anonymous body of majority wants to see on television.
It’s like, if you’re used to doing heavy-duty literary stuff that doesn’t sell well, being human animals with egos, we find a way to accommodate that fact by the following equation: If it sells really well and gets a lot of attention, it must be shit. Then, of course, the ultimate irony is: if your thing gets a lot of attention and sells really well, then the very mechanism you’ve used to shore yourself up when your stuff didn’t sell well is now part of the Darkness Nexus when it does, so you’re screwed. You can’t win.
Well made one. And I think It's would be even more popular than now!