Yeah dwc is about the fastest I've ever seen plants go through water and it was still only about 15 gallons a week for a couple of plants. Most of the time more like 5 gallons every 5-10 days. 5 gallons a day is pretty rediculous.
That does seem ridiculous. Right along the lines of the old media reports of pot busts in which law enforcement would claim to have seized a potential $20k of marijuana, when in fact they had grabbed like 7 spindly plants from some poor saps personal grow.
Hahahaha, him and his whole 10 grams. It's just all fairly silly.
I guess it could be true for an outdoor grow with monster plants. Indoor gardens are more water efficient because you're only watering the soil used by the plant and the plants are usually shorter.
Hydro is even more efficient because you keep all of the water in a reservoir lol. But still the fastest water drinking plants I've ever seen were going through about 15 gallons a week, and only for a couple of weeks at the end of flowering. Not realistic for most grows.
And one plant can yield many, many grams. So, if we are supposed to stop "demonizing" the 1 almond == 1 gallon of water, cannabis gets a by as well.
Yeah, outdoor possibility probably 2000 grams for 100 gallons of water pretty easily over plant cycle. So definitely a better turnover than almonds.
according to some quick googling California makes 59-109 million from tax revenue. Meanwhile a single golf course uses 312,000 gallons of water.
Is it remotely possible that there's enough demand for pot that this growth level is sustainable? I am definitely a little surprised that partial legalization has had an actual impact on demand, if that's the case. People who wanted to smoke smoked.
I don't know, it seems kind of far fetched to me. And I think the dam and hasn't really increased, but the people trying to grow and make money off it has since pot was legalized. So now the market is flooded with mediocre homegrown. The outdoor market that this article seems to be referring to "small farmers" are mostly jumping on the "free money from outdoor pot" bandwagon and havent yet realized that no one is going to pay several thousand dollars for their shitty outdoor.
Yeah. If this article is actually true, I view it as a temporary problem. Not everyone who starts a microgrow op will sell anything. Most won't. Especially if it's shitty. Once they realize that, the scale will shrink. Here is something I submitted a long time ago that you might enjoy, regarding how weed comes to be good or bad.
They do mention that it's "small" pot farms. I've seen some pretty small grow operations, quarter of an acre. I'm predisposed to believe nothing the media or politicians say about pot. It's been a useful whipping boy my whole life and I don't think were done blaming everything on drugs. Might be like post race Obama, just because it's legalized doesn't mean we can't blame it for poor water management or anything else that sounds plausible.
I believe this in the sense that I know what kind of water I know an outdoor operation can use. Like even 5 outdoor plants you could be looking at 10-15 or so gallons a week per plant. So if you're a small time grower in ca and are doing 25-99 plants outside during the summer, your water consumption can really add up. A buddy of mine was in San Bernardino and had a small indoor operation of around 30k watts and it used all his well water up around twice per 3 month cycle and had to buy water which ended up being insanely expensive. And outdoor plants generally get bigger and need more water than their indoor counterparts, so I could maybe halfway believe this. Them and the moonshiners lol, that's who must be using all our water. All 4% of the water used by people other than the government subsidized farmers, who get the other 96%... (I was listening to an article recently that gave these numbers but I think that is what household use of the states water goes like.)