Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
b_b · 4662 days ago · link · · parent · post: Anti Abortion: The ‘biblical view’ that’s younger than the Happy Meal
I've read it. Good speech, and worth. Really, the Hebrews quote above interests me so much as it relates to a fundamentalist reading of the Bible, because it says explicitly that the Old Testament is flawed. Yet, the ultra-fundamentalist doctrine in infallibility of the Word, literal interpretation. How can it be both flawed and infallible? Not that I'm the first person to point out an inconsistency, but that's a pretty fukn big wrench in the gears.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel#Non-canonical_gospels
You really wanna see whackadoodledo, look at the history of the Book of Revelations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_revelation#Canonical_hi...
–
Gospel of Judas is my favorite of the non-canonicals. I love the fact that Judas, in that Gospel, is the only one who can truly understand Jesus, and seems to believe that Jesus is otherworldly (I read one author interpret that as Judas thinking that Jesus was some kind of Alien, but I think the Gnostics took it to mean he was from one of the higher worlds, as their construction of the universe had many layers of heaven and earth). Of course this wouldn't (couldn't) have been chosen for the Canon, because its about subversion and rebellion, instead of strict obedience. In the Canon, Judas betrays Jesus and is punished as a result. Jesus, and by extension The Church, is not to be betrayed; hell awaits for any and all heretics. The Gnostics were persecuted to extinction in Europe for such beliefs.