Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
>How about precisely not f X -> Y or 'non deterministic response'? Fundamentally, broken symmetries and discontinuity.
I see what you are saying, but I think this might be an unprovable quality. I could see computers running evolving algorithms that could lead to responses that might be similar in all measurable aspects.
>I speculate that there exists an interactive field of consciousness and our thoughts the product of that conversion.
That's a crazy but awesome thought. Would beings of lesser consciousness, such as dogs, insects, etc, be tapping into the same field?