Good ideas and conversation. No ads, no tracking. Login or Take a Tour!
Potential whistleblowers are more than aware of what happens to them. This doesn't pass the smell test to me. Under Naomi's hypotheses, the intended audience for this government sponsored charade isn't yet adequately aware of the message they are trying to send. In reality, they are the ones tying to educate everybody else on the very message imo. There is a long history of this, but if you're not familiar and/or you lack the ability to soak in the obvious, you still don't have to look any further than Assange.but does the government really need to make an example of what happens to whistleblowers in this way?