>So basically the goal is to expose the alleged censorship of social media by intelligence agencies, and you don't care if that hurts other people in the process. Got it. You are intentionally shifting what I am saying in order to push your idea as the only true and correct idea. An archive doesn't hurt people, only people hurt people. >What's the first comment I made on hubski? No clue. I have little interest in doing something similar for hubski as it doesn't seem to suffer from rampant censorship, and most of the userbase is intelligent enough to understand how "deleting" works on the internet. >I asked you for specific accusations not more vague ones. You've made enough of those already. If you don't consider documents detailing the meeting with Stratfor enough proof, I don't know what else to tell you. I've tried to answer your questions reasonably but it seems your goal isn't to actually hear what I have to say, instead it is to smear it. Good luck.