You're right about the genes of women also coming from men who fought their ways to the top, but the rest of your post is incoherent, emotional drivel. You refuted one point. I haven't read the article yet, so I'm just saying from an unbiased point of view: You bring up a good point, but overall your extreme anger and lack of coherent arguments does you more harm than good. Edit: After reading the article, even that one point that I ceded is invalid. You deliberately misinterpreted the write-up to make it fit your twisted idea of the world, sans facts, and if you don't see that then I feel sorry for you. The writer here was explaining the evolutionary differences between male and female. That is, what caused each to increase their likelihood of reproduction. Of course this is related to gender, as boys and girls aren't literally clones of each other that are half mom and half dad.